5 thoughts on “Can the company's non -property available for execution be successful through "ofo returning money"?”
Lynn
Once upon a time, OFO was still the bicycle sharing industry, and even the leader of the entire sharing industry. Moreover, this leading status is not only domestic, but also the concept of sharing items in the world was first proposed by OFO. At that time, ofo was infinitely beautiful. But today's OFO has fallen to companies that have no property available. It is really a general change in the sea. In my opinion, the "ofo return" event launched by OFO may play a role in eased the ruined capital chain, but if it is said that it can be successful in self -heating, it is inevitable that there are some exaggeration. Similar activities ofo did not try to try, but ended in failure after trying. Regardless of the P2P assets adopted in 2018 or the later way to convert to the mall gold coin, the final result is not very satisfactory, and the repair effect on the fund chain is also quite limited. Although this kind of activity may not be greatly effective for OFO, it can even be said to have little effect; but anyway, it is still necessary to spell it as ofo. After all, for a company that is already no property to execute, it is profitable for each one to sell one dollar. sma, not to mention that ofo is already liability. The deposit of more than 15 million users has not been returned, and the debt is 4 billion. Whether the arrears of Ant Financial's arrears have no accurate news. In general, interests can still be brought, but as to how many problems bring, it is a thoughtful unknown. From the leading boss to today's rihile, ofo's self -hematopoietic road can still be described with long roads and difficulties.
Once upon a time, OFO was still the bicycle sharing industry, and even the leader of the entire sharing industry. Moreover, this leading status is not only domestic, but also the concept of sharing items in the world was first proposed by OFO. At that time, ofo was infinitely beautiful. But today's OFO has fallen to companies that have no property available. It is really a general change in the sea. In my opinion, the "ofo return" event launched by OFO may play a role in eased the ruined capital chain, but if it is said that it can be successful in self -heating, it is inevitable that there are some exaggeration.
Similar activities ofo did not try to try, but ended in failure after trying. Regardless of the P2P assets adopted in 2018 or the later way to convert to the mall gold coin, the final result is not very satisfactory, and the repair effect on the fund chain is also quite limited.
Although this kind of activity may not be greatly effective for OFO, it can even be said to have little effect; but anyway, it is still necessary to spell it as ofo. After all, for a company that is already no property to execute, it is profitable for each one to sell one dollar.
sma, not to mention that ofo is already liability. The deposit of more than 15 million users has not been returned, and the debt is 4 billion. Whether the arrears of Ant Financial's arrears have no accurate news.
In general, interests can still be brought, but as to how many problems bring, it is a thoughtful unknown. From the leading boss to today's rihile, ofo's self -hematopoietic road can still be described with long roads and difficulties.
It will definitely bring them benefits. It doesn't make sense to do so many things.
I don’t know, I feel like I am very likely to succeed
This solution can bring them benefits, and whether it can succeed depends on the development of the later period.
I think it should be possible, because the project of OFO's money is really attractive.